
Closed
Posted
Paid on delivery
Position: Freelance Expert Witness – Microsoft Word Document Forensics Engagement: One-time independent technical verification of three Microsoft Word document versions This project requires independent technical verification of multiple Microsoft Word document versions arising from an alleged deliberate alteration of a Subject Access Request (SAR) submitted by Parmjit Singh Flora to Carlisle College (NCG) on 25 February 2025 at 12:54. Documents for Analysis: Original (orig): The applicant's final SAR ([login to view URL], 292.8 KB), containing inclusion language requesting data "that pertain to my health, behaviors, and ethnicity." Version 1 (v1): 2025-02-25 SAR [login to view URL] (31.7 KB), sent by Rajan Takhar at 15:09 on 25 February 2025, containing yellow-highlighted text reversing Section 7 from inclusion to exclusion. Version 2 (v2): 2025-02-25 SAR [login to view URL] (29.8 KB), sent by Mal Gorajek at 10:31 and again at 11:17 on 10 March 2025, containing green strikeout formatting through the applicant's original words. Untitled MIME Metadata Files: System-generated email export files (61.2 KB) preserving cryptographically authenticated email headers, DKIM signatures, TLS encryption records, and creation/modification timestamps. Forensic Issues to Address: Semantic reversal – Verify the 180-degree change from inclusion to exclusion in Section 7. Review Pane anomaly – Confirm that Section 7 has no annotation in Microsoft Word's Review Pane despite visible body-text highlighting, indicating the audit trail was bypassed. File size discrepancy – Explain the 5.7% reduction (31.7 KB to 29.8 KB) between versions where neither contains an image. Metadata authentication – Verify that the preserved MIME metadata confirms the email chain's authenticity, internal DPO-to-DPO routing, and a ~10-minute active modification window on 10 March 2025. Colour change – Analyse the strategic transformation from yellow highlighting (25 February) to green strikeout (10 March). Confirm whether the temporal information from the metafile supports the tampering of the original SAR. Deliverable: A detailed forensic report summarising findings on text content, metadata integrity, annotation trails, file-size anomalies, and any signs of deliberate tampering, suitable for use in Employment Tribunal and Information Commissioner's Office proceedings.
Project ID: 40515913
12 proposals
Remote project
Active 1 day ago
Set your budget and timeframe
Get paid for your work
Outline your proposal
It's free to sign up and bid on jobs
12 freelancers are bidding on average £563 GBP for this job

Hello Sir as i am forensic expert and computer engineer so i am fully understand your needs ,s o may we can talk please , thinks.......................
£750 GBP in 7 days
4.5
4.5

Hi, I have thoroughly reviewed the detailed requirements for your Microsoft Word document forensic examination and am confident I can deliver a meticulous and credible independent verification. With strong expertise in report writing and technical documentation, I will analyze text changes, metadata, and annotation discrepancies to uncover any deliberate tampering. My data analysis skills will ensure clear, precise forensic findings suitable for legal and compliance scrutiny. Expect a detailed forensic report that meets tribunal and commissioner standards delivered efficiently. I look forward to discussing your timeline and next steps. How would you prioritize the forensic aspects to emphasize in the final report for compelling legal impact? Best regards,
£555 GBP in 23 days
0.0
0.0

Camberwell, United Kingdom
Payment method verified
Member since Mar 2, 2020
£20-250 GBP
$30-250 USD
₹750-1250 INR / hour
₹1500-12500 INR
$10-30 CAD
$8-15 USD / hour
$10-85 USD
$30-250 USD
$10-30 USD
₹1500-12500 INR
$250-750 AUD
$250-750 USD
₹750-1250 INR / hour
$10-30 USD
₹12500-37500 INR
₹1500-12500 INR
£20-250 GBP
$30-250 AUD
$250-750 USD
₹400-750 INR / hour
₹12500-37500 INR