Em Andamento

Algorithm comparison and description needed

There are 3 algorithm that should do nearly the same but they are different in order to improve performance.

Forst of all NW: [url removed, login to view]

Some A* variation of it is used in YA : [url removed, login to view] // need analyse python source code

And also there is GPU version of it GP: [url removed, login to view]

In YA they did not use normal NW in order improve speed of the program. But what I discovered is that if we run YA that uses normal NW insted of their optimized A* method I get better quality results. I need to know why is it possible. What is more what I use GP algorithm instead of YA I get faster results and those results are even better thatn those from NW.

So what I need is a comparison (description + diagrams with description and selection in dofferences) of those 3 algorithms. I also need to know why (basing on the algorithm) it is possible for them to differ in results and why one can possibly retursn better results than the other.

Habilidades: Algoritmo, Python, Arquitetura de software, Teste de Software

Ver mais: what algorithm, uses algorithms, the algorithm, implementation algorithms, different algorithm, algorithms needed, algorithms implementation, python algorithm, nw, implementation algorithm, algorithm python, needleman, algorithm implementation, algorithm comparison, software architecture diagrams, improve wikipedia quality, algorithm simple program, shuffle algorithm java program, algorithm implementation python, algorithm java program quiz, language description blowfish algorithm, gamezer program speed rating, image comparison algorithm matlab, macros excel description comparison, delphi image comparison algorithm

Acerca do Empregador:
( 138 comentários ) Czestochowa, Poland

ID do Projeto: #6843627

Premiar a:


A proposal has not yet been provided

$200 USD em 5 dias
(2 Avaliações)