I had done a discussion chapter in my thesis. Also, I had done the results chapter in it. The discussion chapter based on results chapter and it submitted a deep interpretation of the results, also it included a comparative compression between the thesis results and other previously published studies.
Remark: the discussion chapter and the results chapter all ready had been done.
My supervisor criticizes the discussion chapter, the one i had did. His criticism was; I had used other studies on the discussion chapter, insisted of ones I had used in literature review. Also, he asked me to elaborate in depth and more details the interpretation of results.
Remark: the point here: studies which I had used in writing the discussion chapter IS NOT the same I had used in the literature review.
In sum, I am willing to hire one to help me do the following in critical, creative and professional manner:
Point 1: He must be able to merge [use] the studies I had used in the [literature review chapter] in developing the [discussion chapter].
Point 2: He must do his best to elaborate more and more details in results discussion.
Point 3: Develop the literature review chapter to include the studies used on the discussion chapter i did and they weren't recover in it.
Remark 1: Chapters are available, and they will be provide after the discussion with freelancer
Remark 2: Most of studies used in literature review are available, but studies used in writing discussion chapter I don't have them
Remark 3: the work is about 3000 words at most
Remark 4: milestones and release exactly as [url removed, login to view] mentioned.
the thesis topic is e-government performance and acceptance