My contrastive particular qualifications are primarily just with blogs and academic compositions but I have extensive reading and philosophical grounding that is based in extremely difficult texts e.g. Immanuel Kant " Der Kritik der Reinen Vernunft" (The Critique of Pure Reason) 1781 or GWF Hegel " Phänomenologie des Geistes " ( The Phenomenology of Spirit ) 1807, " A Essay Concerning Human Understanding " '1689 John Locke or " Sein und Zeit " ( Being & Time ) 1927 Martin Heidegger or , " L'Être et le Néant : Essai d'ontologie phénoménologique " ( Being & Nothingness : A Phenomenological Essay on Ontology ) 1943 Jean - Paul Sartre.
Or conversely, non-metaphysical Analytic theorists ( linguistic Scientific realism targeting elimination of undefined anti-factual unobservable concepts like the Heideggerian " das nichts" / ' the nothing -- ultimate perfect negation' or , Platonic " absolute beauty & model existences " / e.g Platonic solids dodecahedron -- tetrahedron - icosahedron - cube -- octahedron , or just " pure truth ?" ). These revolve on more " logical empiricist" ( AJ Ayer " Language , Truth & Logic " 1935 ) oriented texts such as " Tractatus Logico - Philosophicus " '1921 Ludwig Wittgenstein. The Analytics ( unlike " Continental philosophers " like Hegel , Kant & Heidegger ) use a great deal of philosophy of language to reduce the possibility of propositions which attempt reference to things like unicorns or " round squares" , because their viewpoint is that metaphysics is just a illusion. My undergraduate ( BA ) degree is in these subjects , though I have no graduate degree I was a top performance student.
I also have experience substitute teaching and have a California Basic Educational Skills certification with some few years in the classroom, including 12th graders studying English. My sense of basic rudimentary UK English is generally adequate and I am highly detail oriented, and my definite specificity for content ( on anything ! , whatever that can be rendered into well examined scrutinization ) is very good. I can do proofreading, I can correct most grammar problems as long as they are not overly requiring a major restructure. I can write basic articles and re-write most articles, or other such given long exposition analytical components ( e.g topic outlines , outlining & rewriting research papers , chapter revision on books & so on ) on whatever given subject. My work rate is quite quick and I can take on large implementations or projects as necessary. I am a general applicability writer with a highly proficient basis for very good explication on whatever the topic might be, and can focus on bringing out strong points in written productions that cannot reach fullest clarity without the assistance of a more sophisticated & adept writer's guidance.
>>> fast worker , and on time !
>>> super accurate !
>>> meticulous
>>> excellent language skills !
>>> best editing !